Run results for: convert to set + set.has vs. array.includes

Check if it is faster to convert an array to a set and perform set.has(), compared to performing array.includes() on the base array.

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 128
Windows
Desktop
one year ago
includes
13.4M/s
convert to set
2.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ includes 13,356,017 Ops/sec
convert to set 2,558,630 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
Tests: