Run results for: lodash vs for-of vs forEach

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 127

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

native forEach w/ Object.values (no keys)

76K/s

vanilla for-loop w/ Object.values (no keys)

73K/s

lodash.each

8K/s

native forEach w/ entries

4K/s

native for-of w/ entries

4K/s

vanilla for-loop w/ Object.entries

4K/s

vanilla for-loop w/ Object.keys

2K/s

native for-in

1K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ native forEach w/ Object.values (no keys)	75,542 Ops/sec
vanilla for-loop w/ Object.values (no keys)	73,165 Ops/sec
lodash.each	7,894 Ops/sec
native forEach w/ entries	4,381 Ops/sec
native for-of w/ entries	4,311 Ops/sec
vanilla for-loop w/ Object.entries	3,957 Ops/sec
vanilla for-loop w/ Object.keys	2,265 Ops/sec
native for-in	1,122 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var obj = Array.from({ length: 10000 }).map((value, i) => i).reduce((val, v) => { val[v] = v; return val; }, {})

Tests:

lodash.each
_.each(obj, function(v,k) {})
native for-of w/ entries
for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(obj)) {}
native forEach w/ entries
Object.entries(obj).forEach(function(v, k) {})
vanilla for-loop w/ Object.keys
const keys = Object.keys(obj); for (let i = 0; i < keys.length; i++) { const v = obj[keys[i]]; }
vanilla for-loop w/ Object.entries
const entries = Object.entries(obj); for (let i = 0; i < entries.length; i++) { const [k, v] = entries[i]; }
vanilla for-loop w/ Object.values (no keys)
const values = Object.values(obj); for (let i = 0; i < values.length; i++){ }
native forEach w/ Object.values (no keys)
Object.values(obj).forEach(function(v) {})
native for-in
for (const prop in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) { const v = obj[prop]; } }