Run results for: String.includes() vs. String.matchAll (no match)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 126

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

String.includes()

545K/s

String.matchAll()

415K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String.includes()	545,288 Ops/sec
String.matchAll()	414,872 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = 'vars.test asflkglsfsdfm;l; s;lfkg;sldf g;sd f; sd;fl ;lsd fg;lsd f;gdsfg s df;gl sdl;fgkl;sdkf gl;s df;gl s;dlfg;sdfg }}';
var startDelim = '{{';
var endDelim = '}}';
var matcher = new RegExp(`${startDelim}((?!${endDelim}).+?)${endDelim}`, 'g');

Tests:

String.includes()
string.includes(startDelim) && string.includes(endDelim);
String.matchAll()
string.matchAll(matcher);