Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Some vs. Filter vs. indexOf vs. includes vs reduce
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 125
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
Array.includes
4.4M/s
Array.indexOf
4.4M/s
Array.reduce
4.0M/s
Array.some
3.6M/s
Array.filter
2.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Array.includes
4,365,669 Ops/sec
Array.indexOf
4,365,120 Ops/sec
Array.reduce
3,996,752 Ops/sec
Array.some
3,591,333 Ops/sec
Array.filter
2,931,012 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var hasZero = []; var withoutZero = []; for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { hasZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000)); withoutZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000) + 1) }
Tests:
Array.some
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.some(v => v === 0);
Array.filter
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.filter(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.filter(v => v === 0);
Array.indexOf
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.indexOf(0) > -1 : withoutZero.indexOf(0) > -1;
Array.includes
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.includes(0) : withoutZero.includes(0);
Array.reduce
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.reduce((pre, curr) => pre || curr === 0, false) : withoutZero.reduce((pre, curr) => pre || curr === 0, false);