Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
JavaScript a.includes(i) + a.push(i) vs new Set(a) + concat() + ...spread
new Set() vs conditional push()
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/125.0.0.0
Browser:
Chrome 125
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
!a.includes(x) => a.push(x)
1721530.4 Ops/sec
new Set(a) + spread
1358729.9 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] var b = [2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]
Tests:
!a.includes(x) => a.push(x)
b.forEach(i => { if(!a.includes(i)) a.push(i) });
new Set(a) + spread
[...new Set(a.concat(b))]