Run results for: Array.prototype.forEach vs _.each vs jquery each

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 125

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Array.prototype.forEach

126.7M/s

lodash each

9.8M/s

Jquery each

7.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Array.prototype.forEach	126,700,896 Ops/sec
lodash each	9,798,474 Ops/sec
Jquery each	7,143,125 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.core.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>

Tests:

Array.prototype.forEach
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var index = 0; params.forEach(param => index++);
lodash each
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var index = 0; _.each(params, param => index++);
Jquery each
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var index = 0; $.each(params, param => index++);

Run results for: Array.prototype.forEach vs _.each vs jquery each

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method

Array.prototype.forEach

lodash each

Jquery each