Run results for: .endsWith vs includes with result being at the end

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 124

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

.includes

5.9M/s

.endsWith

5.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ .includes	5,933,439 Ops/sec
.endsWith	5,281,318 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = '"assets/images/add-record-anger-menu-icon-duplicate.svg?v=ANGER_MANAGEMENT_ACTIONS"';
var stringToCheck = 'ANGER_MANAGEMENT_ACTIONS';

var result = null;

Tests:

.endsWith
result = stringToCheck.endsWith(string);
.includes
result = stringToCheck.includes(string);