Run results for: Object.hasOwnProperty vs Object in vs Object[] vs Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs Reflect.has()

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 119

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Object.hasOwnProperty

5.1M/s

Object in

5.0M/s

direct

4.9M/s

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this.storeIndex, index)

3.4M/s

Reflect.has()

2.8M/s

Array.indexOf

705K/s

Array includes

705K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Object.hasOwnProperty	5,123,572 Ops/sec
Object in	4,989,545 Ops/sec
direct	4,931,197 Ops/sec
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this.storeIndex, index)	3,435,178 Ops/sec
Reflect.has()	2,806,832 Ops/sec
Array.indexOf	705,155 Ops/sec
Array includes	704,797 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

  var object = {},
      array = [],
      i, test = 1000;
  
  for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
   object['something' + i] = true;
   array.push('something' + i);
  }

Tests:

Object.hasOwnProperty
object.hasOwnProperty('something' + test)
Object in
('something' + test) in object
Array.indexOf
array.indexOf('something' + test) !== -1
direct
object['something' + test] === true
Array includes
array.includes('something' + test)
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this.storeIndex, index)
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, 'something' + test)
Reflect.has()
Reflect.has(object, 'something' + test)