Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
zlib compatible compression libraries comparison - pako vs fflate
comparing zlib compatible compression and decompression of pako with fflate
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=521006" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/124.0.0.0
Browser:
Chrome 124
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Test name
Executions per second
zip pako a
5.0 Ops/sec
zip fflate a
7.2 Ops/sec
zip pako b
1766.2 Ops/sec
zip fflate b
12333.8 Ops/sec
unzip pako a
20.4 Ops/sec
unzip fflate a
43.8 Ops/sec
unzip pako b
58688.4 Ops/sec
unzip fflate b
29472.8 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://unpkg.com/fflate"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pako/2.1.0/pako.es5.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
const enc = new TextEncoder(); var a = new Uint8Array([...Array(1000000).keys()]); var b = enc.encode('The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog') var ca = pako.deflate(a) var cb = pako.deflate(b)
Tests:
zip pako a
pako.deflate(a)
zip fflate a
fflate.zlibSync(a)
zip pako b
pako.deflate(b)
zip fflate b
fflate.zlibSync(b)
unzip pako a
pako.inflate(ca);
unzip fflate a
fflate.unzlibSync(ca);
unzip pako b
pako.inflate(cb)
unzip fflate b
fflate.unzlibSync(cb)