Run results for: URL vs URLSearchParams vs RegExp

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 124

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

RegExp1

1K/s

URLSearchParams

278/s

URL

219/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ RegExp1	1,128 Ops/sec
URLSearchParams	278 Ops/sec
URL	219 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var location_href = "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2rvSf0STBM&list=RDCLAK5uy_kvhjcPWzH7xZL-WnqGbiA_euQGy5_cbHI&start_radio=1";
var location_search = "?v=x2rvSf0STBM&list=RDCLAK5uy_kvhjcPWzH7xZL-WnqGbiA_euQGy5_cbHI&start_radio=1";
var loop = 10000;
var loop_n = 3000;
var urls = new Array(loop_n).fill(0).map(()=>{
  let t = Math.round(Math.random()*80000+10000);
  return {
    href: `${location_href}${t}`,
    search: `${location_search}${t}`
  };
})

Tests:

URL
for(let i=loop_n;--i;){ new URL(urls[i].href).searchParams.has("list"); }
URLSearchParams
for(let i=loop_n;--i;){ new URLSearchParams(urls[i].search).has("list"); }
RegExp1
for(let i=loop_n;--i;){ /https\:\/\/www\.youtube\.com\/watch.*[\?\&]list=[\w\-\_]+/.test(urls[i].href) }