Run results for: compression libraries comparison

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 123

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

unzip fflate b

865K/s

unzip pako b

87K/s

zip fflate b

34K/s

zip pako b

10K/s

unzip fflate a

537/s

unzip pako a

209/s

zip pako a

85/s

zip fflate a

75/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ unzip fflate b	865,281 Ops/sec
unzip pako b	86,569 Ops/sec
zip fflate b	34,486 Ops/sec
zip pako b	10,344 Ops/sec
unzip fflate a	537 Ops/sec
unzip pako a	209 Ops/sec
zip pako a	85 Ops/sec
zip fflate a	75 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/fflate"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pako/2.0.3/pako.es5.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var enc = new TextEncoder();
var a = new Uint8Array([...Array(1000000).keys()]);
var b = enc.encode('The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog')
var ca = pako.gzip(a)
var cb = pako.gzip(b)

Tests:

unzip pako a
pako.inflate(ca)
unzip pako b
pako.inflate(cb)
zip pako a
pako.deflate(a)
zip pako b
pako.deflate(b)
unzip fflate a
fflate.decompressSync(ca);
unzip fflate b
fflate.decompressSync(cb);
zip fflate a
fflate.gzipSync(a)
zip fflate b
fflate.gzipSync(b)