Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegExp constructor vs literal
Testing performance when using a new RegExp object vs a literal regex
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=511236" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 121
Operating system:
Linux
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Test name
Executions per second
new RegExp()
7416084.5 Ops/sec
Literal
7604629.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var reConstructor = new RegExp('^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$') var reLiteral = /^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$/
Tests:
new RegExp()
reConstructor.test('132abc67219f019afe12901a')
Literal
reLiteral.test('132abc67219f019afe12901a')