Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
lodash.head() vs [0]
Is head() needed only to check length !== 0 ? P.s. Empty testcase for [0] is useless because it won't crash on trying to get nonexistent element
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=508527" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 122
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Not empty [0]
24.5M/s
Empty [0]
23.7M/s
[0] with check
9.2M/s
Not empty lodash.head()
8.9M/s
Empty lodash.head()
8.8M/s
[0] with null check
6.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Not empty [0]
24,496,080 Ops/sec
Empty [0]
23,744,198 Ops/sec
[0] with check
9,183,296 Ops/sec
Not empty lodash.head()
8,881,830 Ops/sec
Empty lodash.head()
8,847,200 Ops/sec
[0] with null check
6,859,101 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var a = [1,2,3]; var e = [];
Tests:
Not empty lodash.head()
_.head(a)
Not empty [0]
a[0]
Empty lodash.head()
_.head(e)
Empty [0]
e[0]
[0] with check
e.length ? e[0] : undefined
[0] with null check
e && e.length ? e[0] : undefined