Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns (parsing)
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Browser:
Chrome 121
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Test name
Executions per second
Dayjs
728176.7 Ops/sec
luxon
97616.5 Ops/sec
js-joda
505541.8 Ops/sec
date-fns
2723637.5 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.11.9/dayjs.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1/plugin/customParseFormat.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3.4.3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@js-joda/core@5.5.3/dist/js-joda.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.9.0/date_fns.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
dayjs.extend(window.dayjs_plugin_customParseFormat);
Tests:
Dayjs
dayjs('23/9/1 0:0:0', 'YY/M/D H:m:s');
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromFormat('23/9/1 0:0:0', 'yy/M/d H:m:s');
js-joda
JSJoda.LocalDateTime.parse('23/9/1 0:0:0', JSJoda.DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern('yy/M/d H:m:s'));
date-fns
dateFns.parse('23/9/1 0:0:0', 'yy/M/d H:m:s', new Date())