Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for vs lodash
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 17_3_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.3.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1
Browser:
Mobile Safari 17
Operating system:
iOS 17.3.1
Device Platform:
Mobile
Date tested:
2 years ago
forEach
1K/s
map
986/s
reduce
982/s
lodash reduce
977/s
lodash map
971/s
lodash foreach
956/s
filter
902/s
lodash filter
825/s
for
759/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
forEach
1,022 Ops/sec
map
986 Ops/sec
reduce
982 Ops/sec
lodash reduce
977 Ops/sec
lodash map
971 Ops/sec
lodash foreach
956 Ops/sec
filter
902 Ops/sec
lodash filter
825 Ops/sec
for
759 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for (var i = 0; i < 12345; i++) { arr[i] = i; } function someFn(i) { return (i * 3 * 8 / 1200 * 0.002 / 40 * 0.2); } var sumForEach = 0, sumReduce = 0, sumMap = 0, sumFilter = 0, sumFor = 0;
Tests:
forEach
arr.forEach(item => sumForEach += someFn(item));
reduce
sumReduce = arr.reduce((lastValue, item) => { return sumReduce += someFn(item); });
map
arr.map(item => (sumMap += someFn(item)));
filter
arr.filter(item => (sumFilter += someFn(item)));
for
for (var j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) { sumFor += arr[j]; }
lodash map
_.map(arr, (item) => sumMap += someFn(item));
lodash filter
_.filter(arr, (item) => (sumFilter += someFn(item)));
lodash foreach
_.forEach(arr, (item) => sumForEach += someFn(item));
lodash reduce
_.reduce(arr, (lastValue, item) => { return sumReduce += someFn(item); });