Run results for: Object.fromEntries vs reduce vs Map vs custom implementation

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 121

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Custom implementation

4K/s

Reduce (reuse object)

3K/s

Map

2K/s

Object.fromEntries

334/s

Reduce (creating temporary objects)

109/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Custom implementation	3,657 Ops/sec
Reduce (reuse object)	3,167 Ops/sec
Map	1,894 Ops/sec
Object.fromEntries	334 Ops/sec
Reduce (creating temporary objects)	109 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var data = { ...Array.from(Array(10000).keys()) };

Tests:

Object.fromEntries
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(data).map((key, value) => [key, value]));
Reduce (reuse object)
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => { acc[k] = v.toString(); return acc; }, {});
Reduce (creating temporary objects)
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => ({ ...acc, [k]: v.toString() }), {});
Map
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => { acc.set(k, v.toString()) return acc; }, new Map());
Custom implementation
const result = {}; Object.entries(data).forEach(entry => { const [key, value] = entry; result[key] = value; }); return result;