Run results for: endsWith vs Includes

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/106.0.0.0 (Edition Yx GX 03)

Browser: Opera 106

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

using endsWith

2.8M/s

using includes

2.8M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ using endsWith	2,815,959 Ops/sec
using includes	2,775,757 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "test";
var stringToCheck = "haha_lol_test";

var result = null;

Tests:

using endsWith
result = stringToCheck.endsWith(string);
using includes
result = stringToCheck.includes(string);