Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Classnames vs CLSX vs [].filter(Boolean).join(" ")
Compare CLSX vs Classnames vs an simpliest implementation of creating a template string
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=500390" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0
Browser:
Firefox 122
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
clsx
6.8M/s
Entries, filter, map, join
4.5M/s
classnames
3.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
clsx
6,835,531 Ops/sec
Entries, filter, map, join
4,502,766 Ops/sec
classnames
3,911,769 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/classnames/2.2.6/index.min.js'></script> <script src='https://unpkg.com/clsx@1.1.1/dist/clsx.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var neco = [true, false, undefined, "lorem-ipsum"];
Tests:
classnames
let result = window.classNames("dolor-sit-amet", ...neco, undefined)
clsx
let result = window.clsx("dolor-sit-amet", ...neco, undefined)
Entries, filter, map, join
function cx(...input) { return input.filter(Boolean).join(" "); } let result = cx("dolor-sit-amet", ...neco, undefined)