Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign vs for-in loop safe performance
Measure the fastest way to merge objects, without mutation.
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=499671" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/117.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 117
Operating system:
Linux
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Using For-In loop
59.2M/s
Using the spread operator
39.6M/s
Using Object.assign
9.3M/s
Using For-In loop with hasOwnProperty
3.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Using For-In loop
59,231,760 Ops/sec
Using the spread operator
39,583,144 Ops/sec
Using Object.assign
9,318,440 Ops/sec
Using For-In loop with hasOwnProperty
3,774,130 Ops/sec
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);
Using For-In loop
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {} for (let key in firstObject) { finalObject[key] = firstObject[key]; } for (let key in secondObject) { finalObject[key] = secondObject[key]; }
Using For-In loop with hasOwnProperty
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {} for (let key in firstObject) { if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(firstObject, key)) { finalObject[key] = firstObject[key]; } } for (let key in secondObject) { if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(secondObject, key)) { finalObject[key] = secondObject[key]; } }