Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match-Fork
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=499145" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:121.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/121.0
Browser:
Firefox 121
Operating system:
Linux
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
String.includes
56.7M/s
RegEx.test
49.7M/s
String.match
20.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
56,661,664 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
49,650,084 Ops/sec
String.match
20,585,702 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = 'https://langehair.com/pages/le-duo-plp-fb' var regex = /\/pages\/le-duo-plp-fb/ var segment = '/pages/le-duo-plp-fb'
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes(segment);
String.match
string.match(segment);