Run results for: RegEx.test2 vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 120

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

RegEx.test

6.6M/s

RegEx2.test

6.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ RegEx.test	6,589,758 Ops/sec
RegEx2.test	6,103,125 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "ungigel.altgigel@vodafone.com";
var regex = /^\w+([\.-]?\w+)*@\w+([\.-]?\w+)*(\.\w{2,3})+$/
var regex2 = /^\w+([\.-]?[a-zA-Z0-9])+@([\.-]?[a-zA-Z0-9])+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,3}$/

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
RegEx2.test
regex2.test(string);