Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Array.includes vs OR operator
Array.includes may be more readable, but is it more performant?
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=495787" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 120
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Test name
Executions per second
Array.includes
2151.9 Ops/sec
Array.includes (cached array)
1292.1 Ops/sec
OR operator
527.7 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var data = [...Array(10000)].map((_, i) => [i, i]); var cachedArray = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f']; var g = 'g';
Tests:
Array.includes
data.forEach(() => { return ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f'].includes(g); });
Array.includes (cached array)
data.forEach(() => { return cachedArray.includes(g); });
OR operator
data.forEach(() => { return 'a' === g || 'b' === g || 'c' === g || 'd' === g || 'e' === g || 'f' === g; });