Run results for: Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocalString rev.3

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 120

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Used defined formatter

3.9M/s

toLocalString

67K/s

Intl.NumberFormat

62K/s

View exact numbers

Script Preparation code:

var formatter = new Intl.NumberFormat("ru-RU", {
    minimumFractionDigits: 1,
    maximumFractionDigits: 1,
});

Tests:

Intl.NumberFormat
var a = new Intl.NumberFormat("ru-RU", { minimumFractionDigits: 1, maximumFractionDigits: 1, }).format("10000");
toLocalString
var a = (10000).toLocaleString("ru-RU", { minimumFractionDigits: 1, maximumFractionDigits: 1, });
Used defined formatter
var a = formatter.format(10000);