Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 13; SAMSUNG SM-A127F) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/23.0 Chrome/115.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 115

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

String.includes

1.5M/s

RegEx.test

621K/s

String.match

349K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String.includes	1,546,389 Ops/sec
RegEx.test	621,095 Ops/sec
String.match	349,024 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");