Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=492995" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 16_6_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.6 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1
Browser:
Mobile Safari 16
Operating system:
iOS 16.6.1
Device Platform:
Mobile
Date tested:
2 years ago
String.includes
21.9M/s
RegEx.test
15.2M/s
String.match
12.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
21,905,912 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
15,187,189 Ops/sec
String.match
12,609,406 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");