Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Array.from(NodeList).map vs [...NodeList].map vs map.call(NodeList) vs. NodeList#map copied from Array vs for loop
Different methods of mapping a node list.
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=491509" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 120
Operating system:
Linux
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
[...NodeList].map
601K/s
for loop
551K/s
map.call(NodeList)
534K/s
Array.from(NodeList).map
449K/s
NodeList#map
316K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
[...NodeList].map
601,132 Ops/sec
for loop
550,904 Ops/sec
map.call(NodeList)
533,779 Ops/sec
Array.from(NodeList).map
449,109 Ops/sec
NodeList#map
316,100 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
NodeList.prototype.map = Array.prototype.map; window.list = document.querySelectorAll('div'); window.mapper = node => node.outerHTML;
Tests:
Array.from(NodeList).map
Array.from(list).map(mapper);
[...NodeList].map
[...list].map(mapper);
map.call(NodeList)
Array.prototype.map.call(list, mapper);
NodeList#map
list.map(mapper);
for loop
const result = []; for (let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) result.push(mapper(list[i], i, list));