Run results for: Vanilla vs Cash vs Bliss vs jQuery JS Library Speed Test

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:120.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/120.0

Browser: Firefox 120

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Vanilla Get ID

6.6M/s

jQuery Get ID

6.2M/s

Vanilla Get Text

5.2M/s

Vanilla Get Html

5.1M/s

Cash Get Text

3.8M/s

Cash Get ID

3.8M/s

jQuery Get Html

3.0M/s

jQuery Get Text

3.0M/s

Bliss Get ID

2.7M/s

Bliss Get Text

2.3M/s

Cash Get Html

2.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Vanilla Get ID	6,633,482 Ops/sec
jQuery Get ID	6,204,626 Ops/sec
Vanilla Get Text	5,166,662 Ops/sec
Vanilla Get Html	5,105,787 Ops/sec
Cash Get Text	3,789,921 Ops/sec
Cash Get ID	3,752,085 Ops/sec
jQuery Get Html	3,043,063 Ops/sec
jQuery Get Text	3,018,126 Ops/sec
Bliss Get ID	2,687,066 Ops/sec
Bliss Get Text	2,347,019 Ops/sec
Cash Get Html	2,334,863 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"><script>
<script>
  jQuery.noConflict();  
</script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/blissfuljs/1.0.4/bliss.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/cash/2.3.9/cash.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Tests:

Vanilla Get ID
var text = document.getElementById("foo");
Vanilla Get Text
var text = document.getElementById("foo").textContent;
Vanilla Get Html
var text = document.getElementById("foo").innerHTML;
Cash Get ID
var text = $("#foo");
Cash Get Text
var text = $("#foo").text();
Cash Get Html
var text = $("#foo").html();
Bliss Get ID
var text = Bliss("#foo");
Bliss Get Text
var text = Bliss("#foo").textContent;
jQuery Get ID
var text = jQuery("#foo");
jQuery Get Text
var text = jQuery("#foo").text();
jQuery Get Html
var text = jQuery("#foo").html();