Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 17_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.1.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser: Mobile Safari 17

Operating system: iOS 17.1.1

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 2 years ago

String.includes

25.1M/s

RegEx.test

18.6M/s

String.match

15.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String.includes	25,112,352 Ops/sec
RegEx.test	18,634,982 Ops/sec
String.match	15,292,173 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");