Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
concat vs spread1
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var array1 = [ "hello", true, 7, { something: 'yes'} ]; var array2 = [ "hello again", false, 71, { something: 'no'} ]; var other = array1.concat(array2);
spread operator
var array1 = [ "hello", true, 7, { something: 'yes'} ]; var array2 = [ "hello again", false, 71, { something: 'no'} ]; var other = [...array1, ...array2];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** The provided JSON represents a benchmark test created on MeasureThat.net, which compares the performance of two approaches: using the traditional `concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`) to concatenate arrays. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Traditional `concat()` method**: This is an older way of concatenating arrays in JavaScript. 2. **ES6 spread operator (`...`)**: This is a newer, more concise way of concatenating arrays introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Pros and Cons** **Traditional `concat()` method**: Pros: * Wide support across browsers and older versions * Easy to understand and use for many developers Cons: * Can be slower than the spread operator due to its overhead * Returns a new array, which can lead to increased memory usage **ES6 spread operator (`...`)**: Pros: * Faster execution speed compared to `concat()` * More concise and expressive syntax * Efficiently creates a new array without copying data from the original arrays Cons: * Requires support for ES6 syntax and modern browsers * Can be less intuitive for developers unfamiliar with it **Library Usage** In the benchmark, neither library is explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that libraries like Lodash or Underscore.js might provide alternative implementations of array concatenation methods. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ES6 (ECMAScript 2015). It allows creating new arrays from existing arrays or other iterables by spreading elements into an array literal. In this benchmark, the spread operator is used to concatenate two arrays: `array1` and `array2`. **Other Alternatives** Besides the traditional `concat()` method and the ES6 spread operator (`...`), other alternatives for array concatenation include: * `Array.prototype.push()`: Appends elements to an existing array and returns the new length of the array. * `Array.prototype.concat()` (as used in this benchmark) * `Array.from()` with `concat()` (e.g., `Array.from(array1).concat(array2)`) * Using a library like Lodash's `_.union()` or Underscore.js's `_.concat()` for more concise and expressive syntax. These alternatives may offer varying trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and compatibility across different browsers and environments.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
ES6 Array concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?