Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Testing perfomance with let and var
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
ES5 vs es6
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
ES5
for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++) { (function (j) { console.log(j + Date.now()); })(i); }
es6
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { console.log(i + Date.now()); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
ES5
es6
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition is empty, which means that the test cases are self-contained and don't require any external setup or preparation. This makes it easier to create and compare benchmarks across different JavaScript engines and versions. **Individual Test Cases** We have two test cases: 1. **ES5**: This test case uses the `var` keyword for variable declaration and has an inline function that logs the value of `j + Date.now()` inside a nested function. 2. **es6**: This test case uses the `let` keyword for variable declaration and simply logs the value of `i + Date.now()` directly to the console. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * Using `var` vs `let` for variable declaration * Inline functions vs direct function calls (or no functions at all, in this case) **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using `var` vs `let`**: * `var`: This is the older, more permissive scoping rule that can lead to unexpected behavior due to its "hoisting" mechanism. * `let`: This is the newer, more restricted scoping rule that provides better encapsulation and prevents global variable pollution. However, it's also more restrictive, as it introduces new syntax and potentially conflicts with existing code. 2. **Inline functions vs direct function calls**: * Inline functions: These can reduce memory overhead and improve performance by eliminating the need to create a separate function object on the stack. However, they can also make code harder to read and maintain. * Direct function calls: These don't introduce any additional overhead but may result in slower execution times due to the creation of a new function object. **Other Considerations** * **Date.now()**: This function returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970) and is used to measure performance differences. However, it's not a perfect measure, as it can be affected by various factors like system clock drift or browser rendering optimizations. * **Browser and Device Platform**: The benchmark result includes the browser version, device platform, operating system, and other metadata that might influence the outcome. This data is likely used to filter out outliers and provide more representative results. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to consider when running JavaScript benchmarks include: * Using different JavaScript engines like V8, SpiderMonkey, or SquirrelFish * Testing with various JavaScript versions (e.g., ES5, ES6, ECMAScript 2017) * Including additional performance metrics, such as GC pauses or CPU utilization * Running the benchmark on a wider range of devices and browsers Keep in mind that benchmarks should be designed to accurately measure specific aspects of performance, and it's essential to consider the potential pitfalls and limitations when interpreting results.
Related benchmarks:
Var vs Let
var vs. const vs. let
var vs let 111
let or without let
let or without let (2)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?