Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Jquery 1.10.4 vs 3.5.1
(version: 0)
Comparing Jquery 3.5.1 to 1.10.4
Comparing performance of:
$jq1102 vs $jq351
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js'></script> <script> var $jq1102 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq351 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <div> <ul id="menu"> <li class="menu-item">1</li> <li class="menu-item">2</li> <li class="menu-item">3</li> <li class="menu-item">4</li> </ul> </div>
Script Preparation code:
function tests($) { $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({ "background-color": "red" }).parent().css({ "border": "1px solid blue" }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({ "background-color": "green" })).end().end().remove(); console.log('tests' + $); }
Tests:
$jq1102
tests($jq1102);
$jq351
tests($jq351)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
$jq1102
$jq351
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two versions of jQuery: 1.10.4 and 3.5.1. The script preparation code uses these two versions to execute a series of DOM manipulation operations on an HTML page. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code defines a function `tests($) { ... }` that takes a jQuery object `$`. This function performs the following operations: 1. Finds the closest `ul` element for the 3rd menu item (`$( ".menu-item" ).eq(2).closest("ul")`) and sets its background color to red. 2. Sets the border of the parent element to blue. 3. Appends a new paragraph element with text "Text." and green background color. 4. Removes all elements from the document. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes two versions of jQuery: 1.10.2 and 3.5.1, both loaded in separate script tags using the `$.noConflict(true)` method to avoid conflicts between the two libraries. The HTML page also contains a simple menu structure with four menu items. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark defines two individual test cases: 1. `tests($jq1102);`: Tests jQuery 1.10.4. 2. `tests($jq351);`: Tests jQuery 3.5.1. These test cases execute the script preparation code using each of the two jQuery versions. **Library: `$`** The `$` symbol represents the jQuery library, which is used to manipulate the DOM and execute the script preparation code. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that using `$.noConflict(true)` to load multiple versions of jQuery can be considered an advanced technique. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** Comparing two versions of jQuery involves several considerations: * **Using a newer version (3.5.1)**: Pros: + May have improved performance, security, and features. + Could take advantage of newer browser capabilities. * Cons: * May break compatibility with older browsers or legacy code. * Might require additional effort to refactor existing code. * **Using an older version (1.10.4)**: Pros: * May be compatible with older browsers or legacy code. * Could reduce the risk of introducing new security vulnerabilities. * Cons: + May have slower performance and fewer features compared to newer versions. + Might not take advantage of newer browser capabilities. **Other Considerations** When comparing JavaScript libraries, other considerations include: * **Compatibility**: Ensure that both versions are compatible with the target browsers and platforms. * **Performance**: Benchmarking is essential to determine which version performs better under specific conditions. * **Security**: Newer versions might introduce new security vulnerabilities or features. Thoroughly review the code before using a newer version. * **Refactoring**: Depending on the changes introduced by a newer version, refactoring existing code may be necessary to maintain compatibility and performance. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for benchmarking JavaScript libraries include: * Using online tools, such as jsPerf or Benchmark.js. * Creating custom benchmarking scripts using a testing framework like Jest or Mocha. * Integrating with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines to automate testing and benchmarking.
Related benchmarks:
jquery 1.12.4 vs 2.2.4 vs 3.5.1
jquery 1.12.4 vs 2.2.4 vs 3.6.1
jquery 1 vs 2 vs 3.6.1
jQuery 3.5 versus 1.11.0
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?