Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation bmt
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash get vs Native
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var person = {name: {fname: 'hello'}, lastName: 'Corcino Alejo'};
Tests:
Lodash get
_.get(person, 'name.fname');
Native
person.name || person.name.fnamr
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash get
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to access nested properties in an object: Lodash's `_.get()` function and native property dot notation. **Options Compared** There are two test cases: 1. **Lodash.get**: This approach uses the Lodash library to access the nested property. 2. **Native**: This approach uses native JavaScript property dot notation to access the nested property. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** ### Lodash.get Pros: * Provides a more readable and maintainable way to access nested properties, especially for complex objects. * Reduces the risk of typos or incorrect property names due to its explicit nature. Cons: * Introduces an additional library dependency, which may not be desirable for all use cases. * May have a slight performance overhead due to the function call and object lookup. ### Native Pros: * No additional dependencies or overhead. * Can be more efficient in terms of code execution speed, as it bypasses the Lodash function call. Cons: * Requires manual property notation, which can lead to typos or errors if not done correctly. * May be less readable for complex objects with many nested properties. **Library and Purpose** The benchmark uses Lodash version 4.16.0. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functional programming helpers, including `_.get()`. The purpose of `_.get()` is to provide a way to safely access nested properties in an object, handling cases where the property name might be missing or undefined. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax. It only relies on standard JavaScript and Lodash functionality. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to `_.get()` or native property dot notation, consider: * Using a different utility library, such as underscore.js or moment.js. * Implementing your own nested property access function using JavaScript loops and conditional statements. * Using a alternative property accessor library, such as `property-access` or `deep-access`. Keep in mind that each approach has its trade-offs, and the choice ultimately depends on your project's specific requirements and performance constraints.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation with sanity check
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation @movlan
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation with longer path
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation with ?
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?