Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
includes as substring
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
substring vs list
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
substring
'someRouteName'.includes('viaCheckIn')
list
['viaCheckInBasicInfoForm', 'viaCheckInBasicInfoSelect', 'viaCheckInSuccess', 'viaCheckInPassword', 'viaCheckInEmail', 'viaCheckInIntro'].includes('someRouteName')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
substring
list
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is the core part of the test, which determines what is being measured. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions: 1. `someRouteName`.includes('viaCheckIn')`: This tests if the `includes` method returns true for a specific substring. 2. `['viaCheckInBasicInfoForm', 'viaCheckInBasicInfoSelect', 'viaCheckInSuccess', 'viaCheckInPassword', 'viaCheckInEmail', 'viaCheckInIntro'].includes('someRouteName')`: This tests if the `includes` method returns true for a specific value in an array. **Options Compared** The options being compared are the different ways to use the `includes` method. The two main approaches are: 1. **Substring Search**: Using the `.includes()` method with a substring, as in the first benchmark definition. * Pros: Simple and efficient way to check if a string contains a specific substring. * Cons: May not be suitable for large strings or complex searches, as it uses a linear search algorithm. 2. **Array Search**: Using the `.includes()` method on an array, as in the second benchmark definition. * Pros: Can be faster than substring search for large arrays and complex searches, since it uses a more efficient data structure and algorithm. * Cons: Requires an additional step to create or access the array. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: * **String complexity**: If you're searching for a specific substring within a long string, substring search might be sufficient. However, if you need to perform more complex searches, like finding a value in an array, array search is likely a better choice. * **Performance**: For large strings or arrays, array search can provide better performance due to its use of optimized algorithms and data structures. **Library** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript has several libraries and APIs that implement the `includes` method, such as the String API. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you need to optimize performance-critical code or perform complex string searches, consider exploring alternative approaches: * **Regular expressions**: For more complex pattern matching and searching. * **Native JavaScript methods**: Such as `String.prototype.indexOf()` or `Array.prototype.includes()`, which might offer better performance for certain use cases. For this specific benchmark, the choice between substring search and array search depends on your specific requirements. If you're looking for a simple, efficient way to check if a string contains a specific substring, substring search is likely sufficient. However, if you need to perform more complex searches or work with large arrays, array search might be a better option.
Related benchmarks:
Performance Test: substring vs substring over limit
charAt vs substr vs substring vs slice test
Performance Test: substring vs substr remove last car
Performance Test: substring vs substr vs slice 5
Performance Test: substring vs substr (remove last 10 chars)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?