Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for in vs foreach
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
omit for 3 keys vs foreach for 3 keys vs omit for 2 keys vs forEach for 2 keys
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var allHeaders = { 'Accept-Encoding': 'gzip,deflate', 'Accept-Language': 'en-US', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'User-Agent': `(compatible; Mozilla/5.0; MSIE 9.0; Trident/5.0;})`, 'Proxy-Connection': 'Keep-Alive', Connection: 'Keep-Alive', Accept: 'application/hal+json, application/json', }; function omit(obj, keys) { var result = {}; for (let i in obj) { if (keys.indexOf(i) >= 0) continue; result[i] = obj[i]; } return result; } function forEach(obj, keys) { var result = {}; keys.forEach(k => { if (obj[k]) { result[k] = obj[k]; } }); return result; }
Tests:
omit for 3 keys
omit(allHeaders, ['Accept-Encoding', 'User-Agent', 'Connection']);
foreach for 3 keys
forEach(allHeaders, ['Accept-Encoding', 'User-Agent', 'Connection']);
omit for 2 keys
omit(allHeaders, ['Accept-Encoding', 'Connection']);
forEach for 2 keys
forEach(allHeaders, ['Accept-Encoding', 'Connection']);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
omit for 3 keys
foreach for 3 keys
omit for 2 keys
forEach for 2 keys
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript loops can be a fascinating topic. The provided JSON represents two JavaScript functions: `omit` and `forEach`. These functions are used to create test cases for measuring the performance difference between two approaches: iterating over an object using a traditional `for...in` loop versus using the `forEach` method. **What is tested?** The tests compare the execution speed of two different methods: 1. **Traditional `for...in` loop**: This approach iterates over the object's properties, checking each key to see if it exists in the `keys` array. If a key matches, its value is added to the result object. 2. **`forEach` method**: This approach uses the `Array.prototype.forEach()` method to iterate over the keys, executing a callback function for each key that exists in the `keys` array. **Options compared** The two approaches are: 1. Traditional `for...in` loop 2. `forEach` method **Pros and Cons:** * **Traditional `for...in` loop**: + Pros: - Can be more efficient for small objects, as it only needs to iterate over the keys. - Less memory usage, as no additional arrays are created. + Cons: - Can be slower for large objects, due to the overhead of iterating over all properties. - May not work well with non-enumerable properties (e.g., those inherited from prototype chains). * `forEach` method**: + Pros: - More concise and expressive code, as it's a built-in method. - Can handle non-enumerable properties without issues. + Cons: - May be slower due to the overhead of function calls for each iteration. **Library: Lodash** The `omit` function uses the `lodash` library. Lodash is a popular utility library that provides a wide range of functions, including those for working with objects, arrays, and more. In this case, `omit` is used to create an object with only specific keys. **Special JS features: None mentioned** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in the provided code snippets. **Benchmark preparation code explanation** The `Script Preparation Code` section defines two functions: 1. `allHeaders`: An object representing HTTP headers. 2. `omit(obj, keys)`: A function that takes an object and an array of keys as arguments. It returns a new object with only the specified keys. 3. `forEach(obj, keys)`: A function that takes an object and an array of keys as arguments. It returns a new object with only the specified keys. The `Html Preparation Code` section includes a script tag referencing Lodash, which is used by the `omit` function. **Other alternatives** There are alternative approaches to iterating over objects in JavaScript: 1. Using `Object.keys()` and manual iteration 2. Using `Array.prototype.map()` or `Array.prototype.filter()` 3. Using a library like Underscore.js (similar to Lodash) Each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs, performance characteristics, and use cases.
Related benchmarks:
for-in vs object.keys1
array object bench v0.1
For loop bench
For loop bench2
for in / object.keys test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?