Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
memoized object assignment (new objects - flat) (moize.simple)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
baseline vs memoizeOne vs moize
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/memoize-one@5.1.1/dist/memoize-one.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/moize@5.4.7/dist/moize.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var fn = function(a, b) { Object.assign(a, b); } var memoizeOneFn = window.memoizeOne(fn); var moizeFn = window.moize.default.simple(fn); var assignee = {a: 1}; var objToAssign = {foo: 'bar', bar: 'foo'};
Tests:
baseline
fn(assignee, {...objToAssign});
memoizeOne
memoizeOneFn(assignee, {...objToAssign});
moize
moizeFn(assignee, {...objToAssign})
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
baseline
memoizeOne
moize
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of different approaches to memoizing (caching) object assignments in JavaScript. Memoization is a technique used to improve the performance of functions by caching their results so that they can be reused instead of recalculated. **Test Cases** There are three test cases: 1. **Baseline**: This test case uses the standard JavaScript `Object.assign()` method to assign properties from an object (`objToAssign`) to another object (`assignee`). It serves as a baseline for comparison with other approaches. 2. **memoizeOne**: This test case uses the `memoizeOne` function from the `memoize-one` library (version 5.1.1). The `memoizeOne` function is a higher-order function that wraps another function, caching its results and reusing them to improve performance. 3. **moize**: This test case uses the `simple` function from the `moize` library (version 5.4.7), which also provides memoization capabilities. **Options Compared** The three options being compared are: * **Baseline**: No optimization or caching is applied, using the standard JavaScript `Object.assign()` method. * **memoizeOne**: The `memoizeOne` function from the `memoize-one` library wraps the original function, caching its results and reusing them to improve performance. * **moize**: The `simple` function from the `moize` library also provides memoization capabilities. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: * **Baseline (no optimization)**: + Pros: Easy to implement, no additional dependencies required. + Cons: May be slow due to the overhead of recalculating properties. * **memoizeOne**: + Pros: Efficient caching mechanism, reduces number of function calls. + Cons: Requires an external library dependency (memoize-one). * **moize**: + Pros: Similar caching mechanism to memoizeOne, but potentially more efficient due to optimized implementation. + Cons: Requires an external library dependency (moize). **Library Descriptions** * `memoize-one`: A JavaScript library that provides a simple and efficient way to memoize functions. It wraps the original function, caching its results and reusing them to improve performance. * `moize`: A JavaScript library that provides a lightweight and flexible way to memoize functions. The `simple` function is designed for use cases where only one argument needs to be cached. **Other Considerations** * **Performance Overhead**: All three approaches have some overhead due to the caching mechanism, which may affect performance in certain scenarios. * **Memory Usage**: The `memoizeOne` and `moize` approaches may have slightly higher memory usage due to the caching of function results. * **Implementation Complexity**: While the baseline approach is simple, the `memoizeOne` and `moize` approaches require additional setup and understanding of the underlying caching mechanism. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for memoization in JavaScript include: * Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js, which provide built-in memoization functions. * Implementing manual caching using a simple object to store results. * Using a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler or a dynamic import mechanism to optimize performance.
Related benchmarks:
Object speard vs assign
Object Deep Copy with jQuery
Create object
Spread vs Object.assign (modify ) vs Object.assign (new)
Object spread
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?