Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object Deep Copy with deep clone 34
(version: 0)
Produce a deep copy of a Javascript object where nested objects are not simply references to the originals.
Comparing performance of:
Recursive Deep Copy vs JSON Deep Copy vs lodash clone vs deepclone vs Recursive Deep Copy 2
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.js"></script> <script src="https://unpkg.com/babel-standalone@6/babel.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function recursiveDeepCopy(obj) { return Object.keys(obj).reduce((v, d) => Object.assign(v, { [d]: (obj[d].constructor === Object) ? recursiveDeepCopy(obj[d]) : obj[d] }), {}); } function recursiveDeepCopy2(obj) { return Object.keys(obj).reduce((v, d) => Object.assign(v, { [d]: Object.assign(v, { [d]: obj[d] && obj[d].constructor === Object ? deepClone(obj[d]) : obj[d] }) }), {}); } function deepClone(object) { let result; let i; let l; if (typeof object !== 'object') { return object; } if (!object) { return object; } if (object.constructor === Array) { result = []; l = object.length; for (i = 0; i < l; i++) { result[i] = deepClone(object[i]); } return result; } result = {}; for (i in object) { result[i] = deepClone(object[i]); } return result; } function jsonDeepCopy(o) { return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o)); } var dimensions = [{ "dimensions": [{ "runtime": { "common": { "client": null, "server": null } } }, { "device": { "android": null, "blackberry": null, "iemobile": null, "iphone": null, "ipad": null, "kindle": null, "opera-mini": null, "palm": null } }, { "environment": { "development": { "dev": null, "test": null }, "production": { "stage": null, "prod": null } } }, { "lang": { "ar": { "ar-JO": null, "ar-MA": null, "ar-SA": null, "ar-EG": null }, "bn": { "bn-IN": null }, "ca": { "ca-ES": null }, "cs": { "cs-CZ": null }, "da": { "da-DK": null }, "de": { "de-AT": null, "de-DE": null }, "el": { "el-GR": null }, "en": { "en-AU": null, "en-BG": null, "en-CA": null, "en-GB": null, "en-GY": null, "en-HK": null, "en-IE": null, "en-IN": null, "en-MY": null, "en-NZ": null, "en-PH": null, "en-SG": null, "en-US": null, "en-ZA": null }, "es": { "es-AR": null, "es-BO": null, "es-CL": null, "es-CO": null, "es-EC": null, "es-ES": null, "es-MX": null, "es-PE": null, "es-PY": null, "es-US": null, "es-UY": null, "es-VE": null }, "fi": { "fi-FI": null }, "fr": { "fr-BE": null, "fr-CA": null, "fr-FR": null, "fr-GF": null }, "hi": { "hi-IN": null }, "hu": { "hu-HU": null }, "id": { "id-ID": null }, "it": { "it-IT": null }, "ja": { "ja-JP": null }, "kn": { "kn-IN": null }, "ko": { "ko-KR": null }, "ml": { "ml-IN": null }, "mr": { "mr-IN": null }, "ms": { "ms-MY": null }, "nb": { "nb-NO": null }, "nl": { "nl-BE": null, "nl-NL": null, "nl-SR": null }, "pl": { "pl-PL": null }, "pt": { "pt-BR": null }, "ro": { "ro-RO": null }, "ru": { "ru-RU": null }, "sv": { "sv-SE": null }, "ta": { "ta-IN": null }, "te": { "te-IN": null }, "th": { "th-TH": null }, "tr": { "tr-TR": null }, "vi": { "vi-VN": null }, "zh": { "zh-Hans": { "zh-Hans-CN": null }, "zh-Hant": { "zh-Hant-HK": null, "zh-Hant-TW": null } } } }] }]
Tests:
Recursive Deep Copy
var dimensionsCopy = recursiveDeepCopy(dimensions);
JSON Deep Copy
var dimensionsCopy = jsonDeepCopy(dimensions);
lodash clone
var dimensionsCopy = _.cloneDeep(dimensions);
deepclone
var dimensionsCopy = deepClone(dimensions);
Recursive Deep Copy 2
var dimensionsCopy = recursiveDeepCopy2(dimensions);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Recursive Deep Copy
JSON Deep Copy
lodash clone
deepclone
Recursive Deep Copy 2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
A technical question! It seems like we're dealing with benchmarking data for four different deep copying methods: `recursiveDeepCopy`, `jsonDeepCopy`, `_.cloneDeep` (from Lodash), and `deepClone`. To answer your questions, I'll assume you want to know: 1. Which method is the fastest? 2. How do the results compare across different methods? Based on the provided data, here are my answers: **Which method is the fastest?** According to the latest benchmark result, the `Recursive Deep Copy` (with 270880 executions per second) seems to be the fastest among all four methods. **How do the results compare across different methods?** Here's a rough ranking of the methods by their execution speed per second: 1. Recursive Deep Copy: ~270880 2. JSON Deep Copy: ~35308 ( significantly slower than Recursive Deep Copy) 3. Lodash clone: ~20471 (slightly faster than JSON Deep Copy, but still slower than Recursive Deep Copy) 4. deepClone: ~27401 (closer to Recursive Deep Copy, but still slower) Please note that these results are based on a single benchmarking run and may not reflect the performance differences between these methods in other scenarios or with different input data. If you'd like me to elaborate on any of these points or provide further insights, feel free to ask!
Related benchmarks:
Object Deep Copy with deep clone
Object Deep Copy with deep clone 3
Object Deep Copy with deep clone 344
Object Deep Copy with deep clone 3445
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?