Benchmark: List filter comparison

Script Preparation code:

var list = [
  { type: "one", value: 4 },
  { type: "one", value: 1 },
  { type: "one", value: 4 },
  { type: "one", value: 1 },
  { type: "one", value: 4 },
  { type: "two", value: 1 },
  { type: "two", value: 1 },
  { type: "one", value: 1 },
  { type: "one", value: 4 },
  { type: "one", value: 1 },
  { type: "one", value: 1 },
  { type: "two", value: 4 },
  { type: "two", value: 1 },
  { type: "two", value: 1 },
  { type: "two", value: 4 },
]

Tests:

Combined filter
var found = list.filter(item => item.type == "one" && item.value == 1);
Seperate filters
var found = list.filter(item => item.type == "one").filter(item => item.value == 1);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Combined filter
Seperate filters

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

unique elements in array using filter v2
unique elements in array using filter v2.3
test filter
JS Filter vs Reduce vs Foreach
remove first item of array

List filter comparison (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Combined filter vs Seperate filters

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Combined filter

Seperate filters

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results