Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Static class query
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
One vs Two
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="test"></div>
Tests:
One
const one = document.querySelectorAll(".test");
Two
const two = Array.from(document.getElementsByClassName("test"));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
One
Two
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing the performance of two different methods to query elements with a CSS class using JavaScript: 1. `document.querySelectorAll(".test")` 2. `Array.from(document.getElementsByClassName("test"))` These two methods are used to retrieve an array of DOM elements that match a specific CSS class. **Options compared:** The benchmark compares the performance of these two methods on different browsers and devices. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **`document.querySelectorAll(".test")`:** * Pros: + More modern and widely supported (it's been part of the DOM specification since 2004). + Returns a `NodeList`, which is an array-like object that provides more flexibility than `Array.from`. + Can be used to query elements with multiple CSS classes. * Cons: + Has historically been slower than `Array.from` due to its more complex parsing process. 2. **`Array.from(document.getElementsByClassName("test"))`:** * Pros: + Historically faster and more efficient than `document.querySelectorAll`. + Uses the `getElementsByClassName()` method, which is optimized for performance on mobile devices. * Cons: + Less modern and less widely supported (it's been deprecated in some browsers). + Returns an HTMLCollection, which is not as flexible as a `NodeList`. **Library/Technology used:** The benchmark uses the JavaScript DOM API to interact with the document. Specifically, it uses: * `document.querySelectorAll()` to query elements by class name * `Array.from()` to convert an HTMLCollection to an array-like object * `document.getElementsByClassName()` to retrieve elements by CSS class name **Special JS feature/syntax:** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. However, the use of modern APIs like `document.querySelectorAll()` and `Array.from()` assumes a certain level of familiarity with modern JavaScript. **Other alternatives:** If you wanted to query elements with a CSS class using JavaScript, other alternatives could include: * Using an CSS preprocessor like Sass or Less to generate the class names dynamically. * Utilizing a library like jQuery to simplify DOM manipulation and event handling. * Leveraging a framework like React or Angular to manage state and events. In general, the choice of method depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName
querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName Test
querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName Test2
querySelectorAll vs filter
querySelector vs querySelectorAll simple (single element result)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?