Benchmark: test123cro - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

// Create an array of 1000 random intergers between 1 and 10000
var arrRandom = [];
for(var intCtr=0; intCtr<1000; intCtr++) {
  arrRandom.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(10000)));
}

function reduceCallback(accum, curr) {
    accum.push(curr);
	return accum;
}

function doRedeuce(pArray) {
	return pArray.reduce((arr, item) => {
    	arr.push(item);
        return arr;
    }, []);
}
function doLoop(pArray) {
	var accum = [];
	for(var intCtr=0; intCtr<pArray.length; intCtr++) {
		accum.push(pArray[intCtr]);
	}
	return accum;
}
function doForEach(pArray) {
	var accum = [];
	pArray.forEach(function(item) {
		accum.push(item)
	});
}

Tests:

reduce
var redeuceResult=[]; redeuceResult = doRedeuce(arrRandom);
foreach
var forEachResult=[]; forEachResult = doForEach(arrRandom)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
reduce
foreach

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

test123cro (version: 0)

test

Comparing performance of: reduce vs foreach

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

reduce

foreach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results