Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
testasd123wdac
(version: 0)
testasd
Comparing performance of:
dsd vs asdasdasddd
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['test', 'testone', 'testTwo']
Tests:
dsd
arr.find(v => v === 'testone')
asdasdasddd
arr.includes('testone')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
dsd
asdasdasddd
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmarking process and explain what's being tested on the provided JSON. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is a JavaScript snippet that sets up an array `arr` with three string elements: `'test'`, `'testone'`, and `'testTwo'`. This code is executed once before running any tests. The purpose of this code is to create a controlled environment for the benchmarking tests, ensuring that the test results are consistent and isolated from other JavaScript contexts. **Html Preparation Code** The html preparation code is set to `null`, which means no HTML snippet is provided. In some cases, an additional piece of HTML might be required for benchmarks that involve client-side rendering or server-side execution. However, in this case, it's not necessary, and the focus remains on JavaScript performance testing. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition contains two individual test cases: 1. `arr.find(v => v === 'testone')` 2. `arr.includes('testone')` These tests are designed to measure the performance of these two specific methods in the Array prototype for finding an element that matches a certain condition. **Test Case Analysis** Let's break down each test case: 1. **`arr.find(v => v === 'testone')`** * This test measures the performance of the `find()` method, which returns the first element in the array that satisfies the provided callback function. * The callback function uses a strict equality check (`v === 'testone'`) to identify the matching element. 2. **`arr.includes('testone')`** * This test measures the performance of the `includes()` method, which returns a boolean value indicating whether an element with the specified value exists in the array. **Library and Purpose** In both tests, no external library is used beyond the JavaScript built-in Array prototype methods. However, if you were to use libraries like Lodash or Ramda, you might utilize their `find()` and `includes()` functions, which would be a different story. **Special JS Features/Syntax** Neither of these tests explicitly uses special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, Promises, or arrow functions. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript benchmarks often focus on measuring performance in the context of common use cases, including array operations like `find()` and `includes()`, which are commonly used in web development. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative benchmarking tools or approaches, here are a few options: 1. **Benchmark.js**: A popular JavaScript benchmarking library that provides a flexible API for creating custom benchmarks. 2. **Google Benchmark**: A high-performance benchmarking library developed by Google, designed to provide accurate and consistent results. 3. **BenchMarkDotJS**: An open-source benchmarking library that allows you to create custom benchmarks and runs them on multiple browsers. When choosing an alternative, consider factors such as: * Customization options: How easily can you tailor the benchmarking process to your specific use case? * Performance: Which tool provides the most accurate and consistent results for your specific tests? * Integration: How well does the tool integrate with your existing development workflow and build tools? Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs, experience, and preferences.
Related benchmarks:
test iteration
Obj vs Arr Js raed
Includes vs Direct access
testasdasdasdzxc
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?