Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
No string building — faster code! Or not?.. Complex data.
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
build strings and compare them vs compare declarative objects
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function translate(arg1, arg2) { return ` some text ${arg1.toFixed(2)} other text ${arg2.toLocaleString()}`; } const template = [' some text ', ' other text ']; function getTranslatable(arg1, arg2) { return { template: template, args: [arg1, arg2], }; } function isEqual(t1, t2) { if (t1.template !== t2.template) { return false; } return t1.args.every((arg, index) => arg instanceof Date && t2.args[index] instanceof Date ? arg.valueOf() === t2.args[index].valueOf() : arg === t2.args[index] ); } results1 = []; results2 = [];
Tests:
build strings and compare them
const s1 = translate(123.45678, new Date('1995-12-17T03:24:00.012+04:00')); const s2 = translate(123.45678, new Date('1995-12-17T03:24:00.012+04:00')); results1.push(s1 !== s2);
compare declarative objects
const t1 = getTranslatable(123.45678, new Date('1995-12-17T03:24:00.012+04:00')); const t2 = getTranslatable(123.45678, new Date('1995-12-17T03:24:00.012+04:00')); results2.push(isEqual(t1, t2));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
build strings and compare them
compare declarative objects
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition provides information about the test case, including: * **Script Preparation Code**: This code snippet prepares the JavaScript environment for the test by defining two functions: `translate` and `getTranslatable`. These functions are used to create complex data structures that will be compared later. * **Html Preparation Code**: There is no HTML preparation code provided, indicating that this benchmark does not rely on an HTML page. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark defines two individual test cases: 1. **"build strings and compare them"`: This test case creates two identical string values using the `translate` function with different arguments (two numeric values) and checks if they are equal. 2. **"compare declarative objects"`: This test case uses the `getTranslatable` function to create two identical data structures with template strings, object properties, and arrays containing dates, and then compares them using the `isEqual` function. **Tested Options** The benchmark tests different JavaScript options for string building and comparison: 1. **String Interpolation**: The `translate` function uses string interpolation (`' some text ${arg1.toFixed(2)} other text ${arg2.toLocaleString()}'`) to build strings with dynamic values. 2. **Object Comparison**: The `getTranslatable` function creates objects containing template strings, object properties, and arrays, which are then compared using the `isEqual` function. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **String Interpolation (e.g., `'some text ${arg1.toFixed(2)} other text ${arg2.toLocaleString()}'`)** * Pros: * Easy to use and understand * Fast execution * Cons: * Limited control over string building * **Object Comparison (e.g., `isEqual(t1, t2)`)** * Pros: * More flexible than string interpolation * Better support for complex data structures * Cons: * Slower execution compared to string interpolation * **Declarative Object Creation (e.g., `getTranslatable(123.45678, new Date('1995-12-17T03:24:00.012+04:00'))`)** * Pros: * Easy to create and manage complex data structures * Supports object properties and arrays with dates * Cons: * May be slower than string interpolation or simple object comparison **Libraries Used** The benchmark uses the following JavaScript libraries: * None explicitly mentioned in the provided code snippets. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript environments (e.g., Node.js) may have built-in support for certain features like `Date` objects and `toLocaleString()` methods. In such cases, these features might be considered part of the JavaScript standard library. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark uses a few advanced JavaScript features: * **Template Strings**: The `translate` function uses template strings to build dynamic strings with values. * **Arrow Functions**: The `getTranslatable` and `isEqual` functions use arrow functions for concise syntax. * **Spread Operator**: The `args` array in the `getTranslatable` function uses the spread operator (`...`) to expand the array. Overall, the benchmark provides a comprehensive test case for evaluating JavaScript performance in building and comparing strings and complex data structures.
Related benchmarks:
Spreading arguments
Test Lodash Get speed V2
Test Lodash Get speed V3.1
typeof vs cached typeof
Lodash.get vs Lodash.property vs native test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?