Benchmark: JS multiple parameters vs parameter object

Script Preparation code:

var data = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5, f: 6, g: 7 }

function f1(a, b, c, d, e, f, g) {
  return a + b + c + d + e + f + g;
}

function f2(p) {
  return p.a + p.b + p.c + p.d + p.e + p.f + p.g;
}

Tests:

Multiple parameters
f1(data.a, data.b, data.c, data.d, data.e, data.f, Math.random())
Existing parameter object
data.g = Math.random(); f1(data)
Parameter object with spreading
f1({ ...data, g: Math.random() })
New parameter object
f1({ a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5, f: 6, g: Math.random() })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Multiple parameters
Existing parameter object
Parameter object with spreading
New parameter object

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 137 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Multiple parameters	94775752.0 Ops/sec
Existing parameter object	14416713.0 Ops/sec
Parameter object with spreading	12329240.0 Ops/sec
New parameter object	13925623.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

JS multiple parameters vs parameter object (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Multiple parameters vs Existing parameter object vs Parameter object with spreading vs New parameter object

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Multiple parameters

Existing parameter object

Parameter object with spreading

New parameter object

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A