Benchmark: Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) 4x workload

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function double(n) {
	return n*2;
}
var data = [...Array(20)].map((v, idx) => idx);

Tests:

Ramda
R.compose(R.map(double), R.map(double), R.map(double), R.map(double))(data);
Array (native)
data.map(double).map(double).map(double).map(double);
Lodash
_(data).chain(_.map(double),_.map(double),_.map(double),_.map(double)).value();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda
Array (native)
Lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Map (Native vs Rambda vs Lodash)
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) vs for
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) latest 2021-01-18
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) v2
Map (Native vs Ramda 0.27.2 vs Lodash 4.17.21) 50k

Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) 4x workload (version: 0)

measures the speed of ramda's map vs Array's native map vs lodash map

Comparing performance of: Ramda vs Array (native) vs Lodash

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ramda

Array (native)

Lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results