Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
smaxer function vs object
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
function vs object
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
function
function setDefault(key, value) { if (localStorage[key] == null) { localStorage[key] = value; } } setDefault("version", "version"); setDefault("message", true); setDefault("hilite", "df01d7"); setDefault("message", true); setDefault("logo", true); setDefault("AT0022", true); setDefault("AT0119", true); setDefault("GB0009", true); setDefault("GB0018", false); setDefault("GB0018-option", "GB_ASSIGNMENT$DUE_DATE.ASC"); setDefault("GB0018-override", false); setDefault("GB0019", true); setDefault("GB0019-import", false); setDefault("GB0019-scoring", false); setDefault("GB0022", true); setDefault("GB0022-option", "All"); setDefault("GB0022-override", false); setDefault("GB0025", true); setDefault("GB0042", true); setDefault("GB0044", true); setDefault("GB0044a", false); setDefault("GB0044a-option", "UPPER($GB_CATEGORY$CATEGORY_NAME) ASC,GB_ASSIGNMENT.DUE_DATE.ASC"); setDefault("GB0044a-override", false); setDefault("GB0045-schedule", true); setDefault("GB0045-email", false); setDefault("GR0033", true); setDefault("IC0001", true); setDefault("IC0001-option", "All"); setDefault("IC0001-override", false); setDefault("IC0002", true); setDefault("IC0003a", true); setDefault("IC0003b", true); setDefault("IC0003c", false); setDefault("IC0003d", true); setDefault("IG0003", true); setDefault("IG0003-option", "All"); setDefault("IG0003-override", false); setDefault("IG0001", true); setDefault("SI0001", true); setDefault("SI0001-option", "All"); setDefault("SI0001-override", false); setDefault("SC0014", true); setDefault("SC0014-option", "All"); setDefault("SC0014-override", false);
object
var test = { 'version': 'version', 'message': true, 'hilite': 'df01d7', 'message': true, 'logo': true, 'AT0022': true, 'AT0119': true, 'GB0009': true, 'GB0018': 'false', 'GB0018-option': 'GB_ASSIGNMENT$DUE_DATE.ASC', 'GB0018-override': 'false', 'GB0019': true, 'GB0019-import': 'false', 'GB0019-scoring': 'false', 'GB0022': true, 'GB0022-option': 'All', 'GB0022-override': 'false', 'GB0025': true, 'GB0042': true, 'GB0044': true, 'GB0044a': 'false', 'GB0044a-option': 'UPPER($GB_CATEGORY$CATEGORY_NAME) ASC,GB_ASSIGNMENT.DUE_DATE.ASC', 'GB0044a-override': 'false', 'GB0045-schedule': true, 'GB0045-email': 'false', 'GR0033': true, 'IC0001': true, 'IC0001-option': 'All', 'IC0001-override': 'false', 'IC0002': true, 'IC0003a': true, 'IC0003b': true, 'IC0003c': 'false', 'IC0003d': true, 'IG0003': true, 'IG0003-option': 'All', 'IG0003-override': 'false', 'IG0001': true, 'SI0001': true, 'SI0001-option': 'All', 'SI0001-override': 'false', 'SC0014': true, 'SC0014-option': 'All', 'SC0014-override': 'false'}; for (var key in test) { if(localStorage[key] == null) { localStorage[key] = test[key]; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
function
object
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is testing two approaches to set default values for key-value pairs in `localStorage`: using a function or an object. **Function vs Object: What are we comparing?** When using a function, you create a custom function that takes the key and value as arguments. The function checks if the local storage already has a value for the given key; if not, it sets the default value. On the other hand, when using an object, you simply access the `localStorage` array and push new values to it. If the key doesn't exist, it will be added automatically. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Function Approach** * Pros: + More explicit control over setting default values. + Can handle complex logic or validation for the default value. * Cons: + May incur additional overhead due to function creation and execution. + Might be slower than object-based approach. 2. **Object-Based Approach** * Pros: + Faster and more efficient, as it directly accesses `localStorage`. + Can be more concise and readable for simple use cases. * Cons: + Less explicit control over setting default values. + May not handle complex logic or validation. **Library usage:** In this benchmark, the library being used is `localStorage`. It's a built-in API in modern web browsers that allows you to store and retrieve key-value pairs. **Special JS features:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, it does utilize some advanced browser-specific features like `UPPER()` for uppercase conversion and `$` for escaping special characters. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative approaches to setting default values in local storage, you could consider: 1. **Using a class-based approach**: Create a custom class that handles setting default values. 2. **Utilizing a library like Lodash**: Lodash provides utility functions for working with objects and arrays, including ones for setting default values. 3. **Employing a more functional programming style**: Use higher-order functions or closures to set default values. Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Object spread operator vs property assignment
Spread operator vs mutation vs Object.assign with reduce
spread vs mutation vs Object.assign for reduce callback for objects
spread vs mutation vs Object.assign vs Object.assign (new) for reduce callback
spread vs mutation vs Object.assign vs Object.assign (new) for reduce callback 1000
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?