Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
rambda vs lodash
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
rambda vs lodash
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js'></script> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rambda/5.13.1/rambda.umd.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var users = [ { 'user': 'joey', 'age': 32 }, { 'user': 'ross', 'age': 41 }, { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 } ];
Tests:
rambda
const reR = R.find(x => x.age > 30, users);
lodash
const reL = _.find(users, x => x.age > 30);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
rambda
lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks. **What is tested on the provided JSON?** The benchmark tests two popular JavaScript libraries: Ramda and Lodash. Specifically, it measures the performance of their `find` functions when used to filter an array of objects based on a condition. **Options compared** In this benchmark, we have two options: 1. **Ramda's find function**: `R.find(x => x.age > 30, users)` 2. **Lodash's find function**: `_.find(users, x => x.age > 30)` These functions are identical in terms of syntax and logic, but they might differ under the hood due to differences in implementation or optimizations. **Pros and Cons** Both Ramda and Lodash are well-maintained and widely used libraries. Here's a brief summary of their pros and cons: * **Ramda**: + Pros: - More concise syntax - Strongly typed (functional programming style) - Good for functional programming tasks + Cons: - Steeper learning curve due to functional programming concepts - Less comprehensive set of utility functions compared to Lodash * **Lodash**: + Pros: - Comprehensive set of utility functions - Easier to learn and use, especially for developers familiar with CommonJS or ES6 modules - More extensive community support + Cons: - More verbose syntax compared to Ramda - Not as strongly typed as Ramda **Library usage** In this benchmark, both libraries are used in their `find` functions. The library is not directly related to the performance difference between the two options; however, it's worth noting that Lodash is a more comprehensive utility library with many other useful functions. **Special JavaScript features or syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's purely a test of the `find` function performance using Ramda and Lodash. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries to Ramda and Lodash, here are some options: * **Ramda alternatives**: + `Immer`: A library that provides immutable data structures. + `Algorithms**: A small set of utility functions inspired by Ramda. * **Lodash alternatives**: + **Underscore.js**: Another popular utility library with a similar API to Lodash. + **Morse**: A modern alternative to Lodash with a more concise API. In summary, this benchmark tests the performance difference between Ramda's and Lodash's `find` functions when filtering an array of objects. The choice between these libraries depends on your specific use case, personal preference, and the type of development you're doing.
Related benchmarks:
Rambdax vs Lodash
lodash merge vs deepmerge vs ramda
Lodash vs plain
ramdajs vs lodash assign vs native
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?