Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
high_numeric_index_object_vs_arr
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
obj vs arr
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
obj
var x = {}; x[30000]= Math.random() x[40000] = x[30000]*Math.random() console.log(x[40000])
arr
var x = []; x[30000]= Math.random() x[40000] = x[30000]*Math.random() console.log(x[40000])
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
obj
arr
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll provide an explanation of the benchmark, its options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between using an object (`obj`) versus an array (`arr`) in JavaScript to store large numbers of values. The test case creates a large object or array with 30,000 entries, generates random values for each entry, and then calculates a value based on these entries. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Object**: Using an object (`obj`) as the data structure to store the large number of values. 2. **Array**: Using an array (`arr`) as the data structure to store the large number of values. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Object:** Pros: * Objects in JavaScript are native data structures, so they may be optimized for performance by the engine. * Objects can also support property access (e.g., `x[30000]`) which might be faster than array indexing. Cons: * Objects have more overhead due to their dynamic nature, which might affect performance. **Array:** Pros: * Arrays in JavaScript are also native data structures and optimized for performance by the engine. * Array indexing is generally faster than property access. Cons: * Array indices must be integers, which can lead to slower performance when dealing with large numbers of values or non-integer keys. **Considerations** When choosing between objects and arrays, consider the specific use case. If you need fast numerical computations on a large number of values, an array might be the better choice due to its optimized indexing. However, if you need to store large amounts of data with property access, an object might be more suitable. **Library/Extensions Used** None are mentioned in the provided benchmark definition or test cases. **Special JS Features/Syntax** No special features or syntax are used in this benchmark. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for measuring JavaScript performance include: * **Benchmarking libraries**: Libraries like Benchmark.js, jsperf, or micro-benchmark provide more advanced features and options for writing benchmarks. * **V8 Profiler**: The V8 Profiler is a built-in tool in Chrome's DevTools that allows you to profile the performance of your code. * **Node.js Performance Testing**: Node.js provides built-in tools like `node --test` or `npm run test` for running performance tests. Keep in mind that each alternative has its own strengths and weaknesses, and some might be more suitable for specific use cases or development workflows.
Related benchmarks:
bitwise vs compare vs includes
executable indexOf vs findIndex when using a primitive types vs when using an object
Test includes versus indexof
arr.at(-1) vs arr[arr.length - 1]
Array.Prototype.at vs index
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?