Benchmark: NodeList For vs Foreach

Script Preparation code:

var div = document.createElement('div');
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', `<span>span-${i}<span>`);
}

var list = div.querySelectorAll('span');

Tests:

Default For
for(let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { list[i].setAttribute('tabindex', '-1'); }
For with length caching
list.forEach(item =>{ item.setAttribute('tabindex', '-1'); });
forEach
for(let i = 0, lenght = list.lenght ; i < length; i++) { list[i].setAttribute('tabindex', '-1'); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Default For
For with length caching
forEach

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 135 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Default For	3379.8 Ops/sec
For with length caching	2192.3 Ops/sec
forEach	5767589.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

NodeList For vs Foreach (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Default For vs For with length caching vs forEach

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Default For

For with length caching

forEach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A