Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 6
(version: 0)
Object lookup performance
Comparing performance of:
a vs b vs c vs d vs e vs f
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5 }; var undef = undefined; function a() {undef !== obj.d} function b() {undefined !== obj.d} function c() {'d' in obj} function d() {!!obj.d} function e() {'undefined' !== typeof obj.d;} function f() {obj.hasOwnProperty( 'd' );}
Tests:
a
a()
b
b()
c
c()
d
d()
e
e()
f
f()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
b
c
d
e
f
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of four different methods for checking if a property exists in an object: `undefined vs. typeof`, `in`, and `hasOwnProperty`. The benchmark also includes two additional functions, `d()` and `e()`, which use these operators to check if a property exists. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code defines a sample object `obj` with properties `a` through `e`, as well as several function definitions: * `a()`: checks if `undef` is not equal to `obj.d` * `b()`: checks if `undefined` is not equal to `obj.d` * `c()`: uses the `in` operator to check if `'d'` exists in `obj` * `d()`: uses the `!!` operator (a doublebang) to convert `obj.d` to a boolean value * `e()`: checks if `'undefined'` is not equal to the result of `typeof obj.d` * `f()`: uses the `hasOwnProperty()` method to check if `obj` has a property named `'d'` **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of six test cases, each corresponding to one of the function definitions: 1. `a()` 2. `b()` 3. `c()` 4. `d()` 5. `e()` 6. `f()` Each test case is designed to measure the performance of a specific operator or method. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares four different methods for checking if a property exists in an object: 1. `undefined vs. typeof`: This comparison checks how the JavaScript engine handles checks involving `undefined` and `typeof`. 2. `in`: This comparison measures the performance of using the `in` operator to check for property existence. 3. `hasOwnProperty()`: This comparison uses the `hasOwnProperty()` method, which is a specific method for checking if an object has a given property. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **`undefined vs. typeof`**: Pros: Simple to implement, easy to understand. Cons: Can be slower than other methods due to the overhead of comparing `undefined` with other values. * **`in`**: Pros: Fast, efficient. Cons: May not work correctly in all cases (e.g., when using a custom object prototype). * **`hasOwnProperty()`**: Pros: Specific, targeted method for checking property existence on an object's own properties. Cons: May be slower than the `in` operator due to its additional overhead. **Library and Special JS Feature** There are no libraries or special JavaScript features used in this benchmark. However, it does utilize some advanced syntax features, such as: * The `!!` operator (doublebang) * The use of template literals (`'d' in obj`) These features are specific to modern JavaScript and are not essential for understanding the basic mechanics of the benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative methods or variations on this benchmark, here are some ideas: 1. Compare different ways of checking property existence using `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty()` instead of `hasOwnProperty()`. 2. Add a new test case that uses a custom object prototype to demonstrate how the `in` operator works. 3. Modify the script preparation code to use more complex or edge-case properties, such as nested objects or arrays. Feel free to experiment and modify the benchmark to suit your interests!
Related benchmarks:
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. hasOwnProperty2
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 2
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 222
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?