Benchmark: Array vs ramda vs ramda-transducer

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js" integrity="sha512-rZHvUXcc1zWKsxm7rJ8lVQuIr1oOmm7cShlvpV0gWf0RvbcJN6x96al/Rp2L2BI4a4ZkT2/YfVe/8YvB2UHzQw==" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var source = Array(1000).fill(1).map((_, i) => Math.random());

Tests:

Array
const arrayResult = source .map(n => n * 2) .filter(n => n > 0.5) .map(n => n / 2);
Ramda
const rResult = R.compose( R.map(n => n / 2), R.filter(n => n > 0.5), R.map(n => n * 2) )(source);
Ramda Transducer
const transducer = R.compose( R.map(n => n * 2), R.filter(n => n > 0.5), R.map(n => n / 2), ); const rtResult = R.transduce(transducer, R.flip(R.append), [], source);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array
Ramda
Ramda Transducer

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Array vs ramda vs ramda-transducer (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Array vs Ramda vs Ramda Transducer

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Array

Ramda

Ramda Transducer

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results