Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
compare clone way
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
json stringify vs lodash deep clone vs Object.assign vs Spread Operator
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
json stringify
var obj = {a: "hello", c: "test", po: 33, arr: [1, 2, 3, 4], anotherObj: {a: 33, str: "whazzup"}}; var obj2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
lodash deep clone
var obj = {a: "hello", c: "test", po: 33, arr: [1, 2, 3, 4], anotherObj: {a: 33, str: "whazzup"}}; var obj2 = _.clone(obj, true);
Object.assign
var obj = {a: "hello", c: "test", po: 33, arr: [1, 2, 3, 4], anotherObj: {a: 33, str: "whazzup"}}; var obj2 = Object.assign({}, obj);
Spread Operator
var obj = {a: "hello", c: "test", po: 33, arr: [1, 2, 3, 4], anotherObj: {a: 33, str: "whazzup"}}; var obj2 = {...obj};
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
json stringify
lodash deep clone
Object.assign
Spread Operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. The provided benchmark is designed to compare four different approaches for creating a shallow copy of an object in JavaScript: 1. **JSON.stringify() + JSON.parse()**: This approach uses the `JSON.stringify()` method to serialize the original object, and then parses the resulting string back into an object using `JSON.parse()`. 2. **Lodash deep clone (`_clone()`)**: This approach utilizes the `_.clone()` function from the Lodash library to create a deep copy of the original object. 3. **Object.assign()**: This approach uses the `Object.assign()` method to create a new object with the same properties as the original object, without modifying it. 4. **Spread Operator (`{...obj}`)**: This approach utilizes the spread operator (also known as the rest operator) to create a new object by copying the properties of the original object. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** * **JSON.stringify() + JSON.parse()**: This approach is simple to implement but can be slower due to the overhead of serializing and parsing the object. It also requires careful handling of circular references, as `JSON.parse()` will throw an error if it encounters a circular reference. * **Lodash deep clone (`_clone()`)**: This approach provides a robust way to create a deep copy of objects, but it comes with the added cost of including Lodash in your project. It's generally faster than using `JSON.stringify()` + `JSON.parse()`. * **Object.assign()**: This approach is simple and efficient, as it only requires a single method call. However, it can be slower for large objects due to the overhead of creating a new object. * **Spread Operator (`{...obj}`)**: This approach is concise and expressive but may not work as expected if the original object contains functions or other special values. **Other Considerations:** * The use of Lodash in this benchmark highlights its importance for creating efficient and robust deep copies of objects. * The choice of browser (Chrome 84) and device platform (Desktop, Windows) affects the performance results, as different browsers and platforms may have varying speeds and memory layouts. **Alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative approaches to create shallow or deep copies of objects in JavaScript: * **Shallow Copy:** You can use the spread operator (`{...obj}`) without `Object.assign()`. * **Deep Copy with Lodash:** Consider using the `_cloneDeep()` function from Lodash, which provides a more robust way to create deep copies of complex objects. In conclusion, each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of method depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference. MeasureThat.net's benchmark helps you understand the relative performance of these methods in a controlled environment.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs Bitfish Simple Clone
deep clone2
lodash _.cloneDeep() vs deppClone()
JavaScript spread operator vs cloneDeep
new Recursive Clone VS other Cloning Methods
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?